So here's the question, are nymphomaniacs any more real than the abominable snowman? If they are, where do you draw the line between a female that is just very sexually active and one who is a nymphomaniac? I have done next to no research on this, and ask from an admittedly uneducated POV on the subject. My curiosity on the matter is not so much scientific, as it is socially inquisitive. That is to say that I care not so much about what shrinks have to say on the matter, (though I understand that there is no real consensus as far as that goes anyway), but rather what you think about it.
This is one definition I found; Nymphomaniac: a neurotic condition in women in which the symptoms are a compulsion to have sexual intercourse with as many men as possible and an inability to have lasting relationships with them.
Swap the gender and it seems to me that this same definition could be applied to describe the vast majority of men under the age of 40, and though there is a version of the term that applies to men, (satyriasis), it does not carry the recognition, or weight of its sister term. (Or in fact the same etymological stigma.)
I tend to think of some woman who I have personal known as having a much greater sexual drive than most I have known, so in this way I believe in the nymphomaniac, but I only vaguely feel it, in the same way I feel there is something such as a soul. Or, is the soul just the name I attach to the collective ether of ones being, personality, expression, mannerisms, etc...?
Though I have always found the idea of the nymphomaniac rather exciting and have never subscribed to the notion that it is a malady, I know this is not the more common understanding.
I also found this as part of the discussion on hyper sexuality, and I tend to feel it is maybe as correct as anything. "Some authors have questioned whether it makes sense to discuss hypersexuality at all, arguing that labeling sexual urges "extreme" merely stigmatizes people who do not conform to the norms of their culture or peer group."
What do you think?
This is one definition I found; Nymphomaniac: a neurotic condition in women in which the symptoms are a compulsion to have sexual intercourse with as many men as possible and an inability to have lasting relationships with them.
Swap the gender and it seems to me that this same definition could be applied to describe the vast majority of men under the age of 40, and though there is a version of the term that applies to men, (satyriasis), it does not carry the recognition, or weight of its sister term. (Or in fact the same etymological stigma.)
I tend to think of some woman who I have personal known as having a much greater sexual drive than most I have known, so in this way I believe in the nymphomaniac, but I only vaguely feel it, in the same way I feel there is something such as a soul. Or, is the soul just the name I attach to the collective ether of ones being, personality, expression, mannerisms, etc...?
Though I have always found the idea of the nymphomaniac rather exciting and have never subscribed to the notion that it is a malady, I know this is not the more common understanding.
I also found this as part of the discussion on hyper sexuality, and I tend to feel it is maybe as correct as anything. "Some authors have questioned whether it makes sense to discuss hypersexuality at all, arguing that labeling sexual urges "extreme" merely stigmatizes people who do not conform to the norms of their culture or peer group."
What do you think?