FluffyGalore
Cam Model
- Feb 29, 2016
- 335
- 703
- 143
- 39
- Twitter Username
- @BonnieBusty
- MFC Username
- BonnieBiggs
- ManyVids URL
- https://www.manyvids.com/Profile/494810/Bonniexxxx/
Meh you have only addressed one persons issues who is not a cam model and therefore not supposedly who you are pitching to in the first place. The issues raised by the models you are not addressing. The only reason I can think of for this is that you can't. You are unable to answer any questions or issues that we have due to you being well aware that what you are offering is nowhere near as much as other higher traffic sites. And you still have shown us no proof of what you are claiming. Your words mean jack shit unless you can back them up.As a company we understand there is no such thing as negative feedback therefor thank you all for interacting and letting us know what you feel.
We do try to adapt to the international market and it's the community that will show us the road to get there.
Because of the size of the company, change will be more come at a slower pace but it will surely come.
And the percentages we are offering now are not like this due to ill-will or miss consideration for your hard work, there is a whole analysis behind them based on cost of member acquisition and profitability.
I would now like to address some of the issues expressed so I can make you rest assured.
There’s no other aspect to percentages on our end but to cover running costs. There are a lot more factors then one might think – it’s not simple as 25-35% for models and the rest for the product.
Pricing is completely up to models themselves and from other member feedback in general it’s deemed fair.
This is a rather subjective view. Take Youtube for example – 1 or 2 videos per week is a given standard, not to loss of quality. It just keeps uploaders relevant or rather gives fans content regularly.
We encourage amateurs to run with this best practice as it helps them make others aware of their content. From feedback and experience there is not quality content ensured nonetheless.
We do encourage members to point out “fake profiles” – there are however very few as every model has to upload verification documents which are proven by our team one by one. Once the documents are manually approved models can start uploading content. Even for any other person that appears in the pictures, videos, livestream along side her, the model is required to upload verification documents. This is what is commonly referred as being "2257 compliant".
Please simply give feedback to us so we can shed light on any issues or take care of them.
What you are referring to is a paywall – a very common tool which you can see in the gaming industry for example. From our tests it did not hurt members joining our community so there shouldn’t be issues here. If its not to your personal taste however it becomes a subjective matter again :/
As for security in terms of authenticity let me say again with more detail:
We here at MyDirtyHobby, not only that we take security very seriously but we have an entire Compliance Department running 24/7 that screens and vets manually every piece of content that goes online.
Every model uploads her verification documents, this also includes a Shot-ID (a picture where the amateur holds her ID in one hand and a piece of paper in the other hand that writes "MyDirtyHobby + Selected Username + Current Date), once the documents are manually approved the amateur can start uploading her content. For any other person that appears in the pictures, videos, livestream along side her, the model is required to upload verification documents.
The account holder needs to be present in all uploaded videos or pictures, we do not allow video content to go online that does not depict the verified account holder.
We can’t prosecute any illegal uploaders outside of our community as we don’t own the rights to the models’ content. However, if we’re asked, we can give advice.