- Mar 22, 2015
- 2,031
- 7,264
- 213
- Twitter Username
- @YesEmpressMika
- Streamate Username
- EmpressMika
- Clips4Sale URL
- http://www.clips4sale.com/store/98997/EmpressMika
Soooooooooooooooooooooooooooo, what in the world is going on? ^_^; I know I haven't been on MFC that long and I also realize caming sites are compromised of more nude models than non-nude ones overall but... since when did "I'm a non-nude model" REALLY mean "I'm a non-nude focused model"? *Face palm*
Arg! If it wasn't already frustrating enough to clarify that I'm a non-nude model on every. single. shift, I now have to further clarify that nudity isn't happening at all. No matter what. This is seriously going on multiple times per shift:
Member: "Are you a non-nude model?"
Me: "Yes."
Member: "Okay, so are you nude in videos?"
Me: "No."
Member: "Okay, so are you nude in pictures?"
Me: "No."
Member: "Okay, so are you nude in group?"
Me: "No."
Member: "Okay, so are you nude in private?"
Me: "No."
Member: "Not even flashes? Really quick?"
Me: "No."
Member: "Not even nipples?"
Me: "No."
Member: "??????????????"
I feel like so many members are now conditioned into thinking that "non-nude rooms" are "mostly non-nude rooms" and there is a way to actually see nudity. This makes it even more frustrating for the models that actually are non-nude like myself. There are more and more examples of "non-nude models" showing flashes of nudity or "non-nude models" showing nudity for non-sexual purposes but still calling it non-nude or even "non-nude models" having nude photo sets and/or videos and/or topless/nude group and/or privates. I wish we would all agree that, if a model shows nudity in any way or aspect of her caming career, she is no longer a non-nude model. She can be a non-nude focused model but she is not a non-nude model.
AHHHHHHHHHHH!
/end rant.
Am I crazy or do you all agree? I'd love to hear some of your perspectives ^_^
Arg! If it wasn't already frustrating enough to clarify that I'm a non-nude model on every. single. shift, I now have to further clarify that nudity isn't happening at all. No matter what. This is seriously going on multiple times per shift:
Member: "Are you a non-nude model?"
Me: "Yes."
Member: "Okay, so are you nude in videos?"
Me: "No."
Member: "Okay, so are you nude in pictures?"
Me: "No."
Member: "Okay, so are you nude in group?"
Me: "No."
Member: "Okay, so are you nude in private?"
Me: "No."
Member: "Not even flashes? Really quick?"
Me: "No."
Member: "Not even nipples?"
Me: "No."
Member: "??????????????"
I feel like so many members are now conditioned into thinking that "non-nude rooms" are "mostly non-nude rooms" and there is a way to actually see nudity. This makes it even more frustrating for the models that actually are non-nude like myself. There are more and more examples of "non-nude models" showing flashes of nudity or "non-nude models" showing nudity for non-sexual purposes but still calling it non-nude or even "non-nude models" having nude photo sets and/or videos and/or topless/nude group and/or privates. I wish we would all agree that, if a model shows nudity in any way or aspect of her caming career, she is no longer a non-nude model. She can be a non-nude focused model but she is not a non-nude model.
AHHHHHHHHHHH!
/end rant.
Am I crazy or do you all agree? I'd love to hear some of your perspectives ^_^