Models violate the rules!. Thats normal?. i report this and nothing happen!

[DrunkCat]

Long time any models hidden the banned words with symbols or number example: vomit for "vom1t" pee for "p33". or " p3* ". For try to dont get banned and keep doing prohibiteds shows without problem, in the threat or tittle of the SHOW GROUP they put VOM1T INSIDE THE SHOW! offering a lot time puke and pee they writte: (puk3- p3*). and nothing happen, i report this and the support team for the choice on stripchat and for email too and they dont see that because they try to hidden the words..

I will add example with the room "sex_orgy01". Thats absolutely incredible like they says this and do this and nothing happen

I WILL ADD THE SCREENSHOTS and i hope the support team can be do anything for these kinds of things dont continue happen.

 

[Iluvablow69]

Long time any models hidden the banned words with symbols or number example: vomit for "vom1t" pee for "p33". or " p3* ". For try to dont get banned and keep doing prohibiteds shows without problem, in the threat or tittle of the SHOW GROUP they put VOM1T INSIDE THE SHOW! offering a lot time puke and pee they writte: (puk3- p3*). and nothing happen, i report this and the support team for the choice on stripchat and for email too and they dont see that because they try to hidden the words..

I will add example with the room "sex_orgy01". Thats absolutely incredible like they says this and do this and nothing happen

I WILL ADD THE SCREENSHOTS and i hope the support team can be do anything for these kinds of things dont continue happen.

I'm struggling to understand the issue.
Models are typing in a way that makes it less obvious they are doing things against the ToS.

But why do you want them banned for it?
If you don't want to see it, don't watch it.
I am sure they will eventually get caught out doing something wrong; then we can all say Hi to them on this forum

 

[Jessica_StripchatCM]

When something like this arises, please report it to support. Posting it here may not get the issue addressed in a timely fashion. Support on the site is the best route to go through.

 

[MarieElise]

I'm struggling to understand the issue.
Models are typing in a way that makes it less obvious they are doing things against the ToS.

But why do you want them banned for it?
If you don't want to see it, don't watch it.
I am sure they will eventually get caught out doing something wrong; then we can all say Hi to them on this forum

Because they are a studio owner or another cam model, playing cam police to take out the competition. There's never a positive reason for someone to go obsessive cam police over small things. It's always some kind of lame bozo with an axe to grind for petty, immature things. Lots of sites actually view that as harassment, and the person obsessing and over reporting, will get in trouble. But probably not SC. They have terrible rules.

This particular issue falls under code 15.5.5 subsection III. And is commonly known as; "Get a life".

 

[jme36m]

I'm struggling to understand the issue.
Models are typing in a way that makes it less obvious they are doing things against the ToS.

But why do you want them banned for it?
If you don't want to see it, don't watch it.
I am sure they will eventually get caught out doing something wrong; then we can all say Hi to them on this forum

Man pvt shows are ment to be unrestricted now. Yes there are girls who if paid enough would be down for any thing. But there are some studios who are telling new girls they can't mute or kick people as their score drops and the pages won't send people to their rooms any more.

 

[jme36m]

Because they are a studio owner or another cam model, playing cam police to take out the competition. There's never a positive reason for someone to go obsessive cam police over small things. It's always some kind of lame bozo with an axe to grind for petty, immature things. Lots of sites actually view that as harassment, and the person obsessing and over reporting, will get in trouble. But probably not SC. They have terrible rules.

This particular issue falls under code 15.5.5 subsection III. And is commonly known as; "Get a life".

You make things out as the user is the one to blame and the models don't cause any of it?

Yes there are those who stalk the girls, there are also many girls who tell users a load of BS thinking that they can get away with every thing, what happens when they scam someone who has a few screws lose and he decides to come after the model?

TmBoth parties needs to be held accountable also the monitors and depending on how serious it is the studio owners.

 

[rockin_rod]

Man pvt shows are ment to be unrestricted now.

Huh?

 

[misterical]

This idiot doesn't realise that the chat snippet also shows him asking for prohibited things. I'm sure in any other context this would be seen as entrapment.

 

[Hiunds]

This kind of stuff happens all the time on SC. Personally, I don’t really care what gets people off (other than lack of consent, minors, etc), but I fully understand why sites like SC need to draw the line where they do

 

[MarieElise]

You make things out as the user is the one to blame and the models don't cause any of it?

Yes there are those who stalk the girls, there are also many girls who tell users a load of BS thinking that they can get away with every thing, what happens when they scam someone who has a few screws lose and he decides to come after the model?

TmBoth parties needs to be held accountable also the monitors and depending on how serious it is the studio owners.

Too diffuse. Not responding past this. Seems to me like you used my comment as a jump off for random loosely related thoughts (at best). I just fail to see any connection from what you responded to me, to anything I was actually saying. Randos who don't work for the site shouldn't nitpick and police cam models. It's a weird red flag of obsessive, boundary crossing behavior. Don't care whether it's viewers or models, it's weird AF.

If you see something say something, like minors on cam, or serious shit. Otherwise refer to Title 15.5.5 subsection III. I stand by that.