AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

MFC bans all Vietnamese cam models

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oct 3, 2020
2
0
0
California
So yesterday about 10am PST I noticed that I could not see the profiles of certain models. I kept snooping around and found out it was really just Vietnamese models that I couldn't see their profiles. Even the ones that were currently on cam. Eventually about 30 minutes later one by one they all started to disappear from cam. So I looked through the profiles.myfreecams and searched the girls that I knew and all of them were listed as unactive models now. It seems that MFC has banned every Vietnamese model on the site. Later on one of those girls that I have added on skype told me that MFC banned every girl from Vietnam period.

A little background for those that don't know. Vietnamese cam girls usually work in a studio which is a really popular way to work nowadays on cam sites. However, not all of these girls work in the same studio. There is one in Hanoi (North Vietnam) and two in Ho Chi Minh (South Vietnam). Most of these girls use these studios to make a livable wage and pay their debt and have a certain criteria they have to meet every 2 weeks. However it seems that MFC banned them because one model showed a baby on stream. This girl did not seem to be affiliated with those girls in the studios and was independent, but MFC banned every single girl from Vietnam. Most of those girls are scared that they won't get the money they made up to this point in the month.

I feel that MFC went too far with this and it needs more attention. Is there any suggestions on what can be done? Also what are your thoughts on this? Is it fair to you? I am not sure if once you're banned if you can still receive pay from the tokens that you made, but if not then that is really fucked up on MFC's part. This is about 10-15 girls' lives their affecting.
 
Okay, so I'm glad I'm not the only one who looks like this and goes "WTF" every time InAweOfCB posts.....

GIF by Giphy QA


And what's up with the overuse of quotation marks? Like people nowadays will say..."make it make sense." :giggle:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
There has been a lot of questions about MFC banning x or y country recently. Don't forget that Leonid Ravinsky (the owner of MFC and Onlyfans to some extend) has been on trial for three years now, concerning his sites being very lax about underaged models (I don't really see the point of it, as they aren't more or less lax that any other camsite). I guess there has been a lot of bans for studios that were suspected of registering underage models.
 
  • Wat?!
Reactions: AmberCutie
Upvote 0
Don't forget that Leonid Ravinsky (the owner of MFC and Onlyfans to some extend) has been on trial for three years now, concerning his sites being very lax about underaged models
What in the frick are you even talking about? Not true. Don't be part of the false gossip chain about him/MFC/OF. It's ridiculous. There's no room for that here.
 
Upvote 0
What in the frick are you even talking about? Not true. Don't be part of the false gossip chain about him/MFC/OF. It's ridiculous. There's no room for that here.
Using google is so difficult before rushing to defend your favorite site?

 
Upvote 0
Using google is so difficult before rushing to defend your favorite site?


But you said that Leo has been on trial for three years now for allowing underage models on MFC. That is blatantly untrue. Maybe you meant to say he has had allegations thrown at him, but your post came off as if he’s been indicted for criminal activity and he has been in an ongoing criminal trial for three years, which is definitely not the case.

Also, that article has already been posted here and needs to be taken with a grain of salt. Two of the main people they took quotes from for that article flat out lied about what happened in their given situations.

Kickaz, who was the only person they quoted in the “MFC Theft Allegations” section despite trying to make it seem like it was multiple quotes from different models, lied about her situation. She wasn’t banned because she told her fans not to tip for a day. She was actively organizing a site wide boycott with as many models as she could get on board so that they would leave their cameras on but tell their members not to tip so they would cost MFC in bandwidth. She was actively trying to cost them money. That’s after sending support incredibly rude messages, which she posted on her Twitter because for some reason she thought it would make her look good. Also, a good while before she got banned she tried to say that MFC stole her money because she was having issues with her foreign bank, but she eventually got her money in the end but never came out and said anything about MFC or apologizing for the allegations. The situation with Choice Bank was a situation with Choice Bank. It was a horrible situation, but it didn’t have anything to do with Leo. There’s a thread with literally thousands of posts describing that whole situation on here.

Stefani, who is the model they talked about in the “Drug Allegations” section, didn’t get banned because she threatened another model. They told her she couldn’t cam from the MFC booth at AVN. She flipped out and started throwing all kinds of allegations Leo’s way because she was pissed and after she started trashing him all over Twitter, that’s when she was banned. She also promised she would post definitive proof that her allegations were true, but never did.
 
Upvote 1
Using google is so difficult before rushing to defend your favorite site?


I don't use MFC and shut down my OF account awhile ago so there is zero reason for me to defend either site. I read the article you posted and here's what it says about the underage thing:

Some of the most concerning allegations in the SARs are the banks’ written warnings that MFCXY “may be operating in areas where underage children, and other vulnerable individuals might be forced to provide services.” Though the banks did not detail specific incidents of underage activity, they highlighted the fact that money was being sent to performers in “high-risk” areas such as Colombia, Romania, Poland, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Lithuania, the Philippines, and Russia.

Note the "high-risk" part. They aren't saying that MFC did indeed have underage performers. They are saying that MFC has performers from areas that they deem to be high risk. There is a key difference.

I can't say much about the money laundering aspect, but it seems like a pretty strange charge considering that there are performers from all over so yeah, they are sending large sums of money to different banks around the world. Additionally, businesses, especially big businesses, move money in between their own accounts all the time.

Another quote from the article. Super important quote too!

The banking documents point to numerous potential legal difficulties for Radvinsky. There have been no charges filed against Radvinsky and the allegations within the banking documents are not conclusive evidence of any criminal wrongdoing.
 
Upvote 1
Yup, confused SAR and trial, my fault indeed. However that's not a great thing neither. If I remeber well it was after a similar thing that Pornhub did a big cleaning.

My point was that i see a lot of people complaining about bans on MFC (there is a similar post about Kazakstan a little further on the forum) and other, about difficulties to register new models on the site. I think that may be related. As i said before I don't think that MFC verification is worse or better then any other camsite (never worked on MFC, jsut been registered there a couple of years ago. I have nothing against the site apart being very outdated)

Yes that article is catchy and mix blatantly stereotypes against adult industry and racism against eastern europeans. Tho Leonid is far away for being a saint.
 
Upvote 0
Just to be clear, SARs are actually pretty common in banking. If someone brings in or withdraws 10k+ in cash, a CTR must be filled out. If someone does this many times, a SAR is typically filled out as well unless said person and their business is well known to the bank. Even then, the bank may feel like something is off. SARs can be filed for many different reasons including just having a weird vibe from a client and their deposits/withdrawals. Any one of you could have had a SAR filed against your account without you even knowing about it. Sometimes the SARs lead to fraud, but usually they go nowhere. Source: myself - I worked in banking.
 
Upvote 0
Using google is so difficult before rushing to defend your favorite site?

We have already debunked and discussed the illegitimacy of that article.
 
Upvote 0
Using google is so difficult before rushing to defend your favorite site?
Is checking the legitimately of the sources in the article so difficult before spreading misinformation?
 
Upvote 0
That article was written by a conspiracy theorist who wrote a trump/Russia gate book, made a weird self promo AMA on reddit he got made of fun on, purposefully baited sex workers on twitter to privately message him ---his "news site" is more like a blog & he caused a big stir and panic on twitter resulting in him getting heaps of attention for free from sex workers and way more eyes on the article than it ever would have organically. I think using him as a reliable source is a huge disservice to sex workers.
 
Upvote 0
*Sigh*

-A site owner is accused (fake or not, whatever) of having a dubious security that could be easily frauded by underage models or studios employing underage models

-The site change the list of documents asked for registration in certains countries, to have more guarantees about models being 18+

-The site bans several studios that may have employed underaged models.

Acf reaction

HE IS A SAINT ALL THOSE THINGS ARE TOTALLY NOT RELATED11111

10/10 logic.
 
Upvote 0
Makes serious false accusations, gets questioned, posts link to conspiracy article to "prove" their point (post made with serious attitude to forum owner as a bonus), gets told why all of that is wrong and harmful to spread, comes back and doubles down with terrible attitude.

That's some
10/10 logic.
right there!

Totally done with this poster.
 
Upvote 1
Status
Not open for further replies.