AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

low mfc camscores

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Aug 3, 2014
7
3
16
31
As I scroll downward on MFC yes, of course, the camscores are lower. I just know thought o ask this question: what happens if your camscore reaches 0. The lowest on MFC that I have just seen was a camscore of 46. I was so appalled at that but the woman was smoking on camera and showing off her outfit not her face. Maybe that's why...
 
Lowest camscore I've seen is either 31 or 26.

Because camscore is also based off of the average of all other models on the site, I don't think you CAN reach zero, but idk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PlayboyMegan
I saw a camscore of 21 once-that's the lowest I've seen. I wonder why women even continue to cam if their camscore is super low, like under 100. I think 100 and lower camscore is like $2 an hour?
 
Honestly with camscores as low as those mentioned, I as the owner or administrator would have to go into those rooms and take a good hard look to see if they are even trying. If I feel they are not, then I would have to make a decision as to allow them to continue. I know this sounds awful, but a business needs to be run. And although minimal, wasted bandwidth is wasted bandwidth. Please understand, that I stress the word "trying" as if I feel they are at least making a concerted to be successful, I would keep them on. But models, who are not paying attention to the room, or not realizing that what they are doing isn't working. They have to go. Business 101. I wouldn't be on mfc or here if i were not a perv. But I am a businessman first.

P.S. What i said about the low camscore models, also applies to studios who are not pulling in the business with there models...
 
Ataboy said:
Honestly with camscores as low as those mentioned, I as the owner or administrator would have to go into those rooms and take a good hard look to see if they are even trying. If I feel they are not, then I would have to make a decision as to allow them to continue. I know this sounds awful, but a business needs to be run. And although minimal, wasted bandwidth is wasted bandwidth. Please understand, that I stress the word "trying" as if I feel they are at least making a concerted to be successful, I would keep them on. But models, who are not paying attention to the room, or not realizing that what they are doing isn't working. They have to go. Business 101. I wouldn't be on mfc or here if i were not a perv. But I am a businessman first.

P.S. What i said about the low camscore models, also applies to studios who are not pulling in the business with there models...

MFC makes so much money though. I doubt that little wasted bandwidth is a concern.
 
Ataboy said:
Honestly with camscores as low as those mentioned, I as the owner or administrator would have to go into those rooms and take a good hard look to see if they are even trying. If I feel they are not, then I would have to make a decision as to allow them to continue. I know this sounds awful, but a business needs to be run. And although minimal, wasted bandwidth is wasted bandwidth. Please understand, that I stress the word "trying" as if I feel they are at least making a concerted to be successful, I would keep them on. But models, who are not paying attention to the room, or not realizing that what they are doing isn't working. They have to go. Business 101. I wouldn't be on mfc or here if i were not a perv. But I am a businessman first.

P.S. What i said about the low camscore models, also applies to studios who are not pulling in the business with there models...

That would be bad business 101. Leaving the lower camscore models actually IS part of their business model.

First, by allowing even the low camscore models to stay they propagate an environment where models in general know they won't get kicked out for some lame reason (see complaints about other sites on the forum for more on that). This allows many models to sign up, and thereby ensures at any point of the day/week there's a wide variety of lady's online.

That leads to the second point, the more models on a site the more attractive it is to new members to come to the site, thus more income overall. That's why it's so hard for new cam sites to open up. In the beginning with only a few models they just don't get member traffic.
 
SexyStephXS said:
MFC makes so much money though. I doubt that little wasted bandwidth is a concern.

Indeed - bandwidth when bought in bulk (in the scale of dozens to hundreds of Gbps) costs way less than in the end-user market.. So MFC is probably 'wasting' in total just a few hundreds of dollars per day... And as Jerry said in his second point, this gets spun as something better in their marketing, which is worth way more.
 
weirdbr said:
SexyStephXS said:
MFC makes so much money though. I doubt that little wasted bandwidth is a concern.

Indeed - bandwidth when bought in bulk (in the scale of dozens to hundreds of Gbps) costs way less than in the end-user market.. So MFC is probably 'wasting' in total just a few hundreds of dollars per day... And as Jerry said in his second point, this gets spun as something better in their marketing, which is worth way more.

Yeah, if this was the kind of company to be upset about wasting bandwidth, we'd have noticed that in other areas.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.