AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

kid in same room as you..

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
Status
Not open for further replies.

purelove

I haven't posted recently, hopefully will be back soon!
Inactive Cam Model
Oct 8, 2012
22
14
16
today i was looking around @ girls on there cam in the lower models and the was a chick who had there kid in the same room as them. i personally think that IS WRONG. i try to be nice can contribute back into mfc but god dam why would someone do this? whats YOUR opinion on having your kid in the same room as you while on cam.. the kid sounded like he was ( yes the kid was a male!) 2 years old! is it just me or is that bad parenting? :think:
 
This reminds me of a rather heated thread a while ago where some models were saying that it is okay to show your room pictures of your kids and whatnot... I would wager that if we had a broader selection of models, some of them would argue that it is okay to have kids in the room with you (as long as the kid is too young to know what's going on, as long as he isn't looking while you do things, et cetera).

It seems pretty cut and dry that children should not be involved in any way when you whore yourself (and this is also my opinion), but a larger number of women are okay with involving their children in sex work than you might think.
 
Not only is it bad parenting it is against MFC rules. Camming is 18+ period. No child should be anywhere near the camera or room.
 
Seems like a very bad idea to me. Images of the kids could get distributed all over the place, and that's just ... bad.

From a viewer's standpoint, I find the idea of mixing children being present into a scene with a woman being sexy or outright sexual to be very very disturbing. I'd be out of that room in a heartbeat.
 
just to chime in...

if the kid in question is pre verbal and theres no active sexual practices then it doesnt matter as long as they arent on screen ( mfc rules) if they are on screen i question the wisdom of it simply because of security.

if there is sexual activity thats another line, one which in the western world is probably not a good idea. in other cultures open sexuality in front of children is no big deal, and has not been proven harmful to them as adults later on. that being said sexual exposure is highly cultural in that regard. what works in a primitive tribe wont work in modern america or most of the western world. heck, id wager a guess that most of asia it wouldnt work out well either.

nudity and sex in and of themselves cause no harm when in front of anyone. we are born naked, and nudity is a healthy thing. sex should be a good thing rather than something to be ashamed of, but since the judeo christian values dominate anyone crossing that boundary is likely to suffer social stigmatism. thus it can be deemed harmful if done on a regular basis without proper education and guidance.

the other line is if the child is verbal. by the time a kid can form sentences their brain is going to actively absorb everything else too. so plucking the pink pearl in front of a kid isnt too smart. yes, if everything is explained in an open intelligent manner its not a big deal, but how many people in the world are actually open and intelligent?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.