oh ShyToonn, will you never learn?UncleThursday said:Checking the last model before the "away" status girls... she has a camscore of 59. Fifty-nine. Even though she is trying to steal Shy's name.
oh ShyToonn, will you never learn?UncleThursday said:Checking the last model before the "away" status girls... she has a camscore of 59. Fifty-nine. Even though she is trying to steal Shy's name.
Jupiter551 said:oh ShyToonn, will you never learn?UncleThursday said:Checking the last model before the "away" status girls... she has a camscore of 59. Fifty-nine. Even though she is trying to steal Shy's name.
UncleThursday said:It's quite possible to say that MFC epitomizes the free market and competitive market place, in some ways.
Limiting the models isn't a viable answer. It hurts models who are trying to scrape by, and prevents any new models from joining. And, despite the hope that it would spread the wealth around, it most likely won't. The top models will still be taking 90%+ of all the tokens available while they are online, and the bottom models will still be making hardly anything. Those in between probably won't see any significant increase in income, either.
As much as some people probably dislike your idea, I actually agree. Girls under 100 camscore can't be making more than about $2.00 per hour. If you're making that much, you're probably either not cut out to be a camgirl or should try out a different site.nzhere said:Limiting the models isn't a viable answer. It hurts models who are trying to scrape by, and prevents any new models from joining. And, despite the hope that it would spread the wealth around, it most likely won't. The top models will still be taking 90%+ of all the tokens available while they are online, and the bottom models will still be making hardly anything. Those in between probably won't see any significant increase in income, either.
I say after every cutoff day cull all the sub 100 camscores models and block them from resigning up for a minimum of 3 months.
If they have a camscore that low, they should perhaps find another site or cut their losses and quit.
How charming.Jupiter551 said:imagine the desperate things the 150s would do to not dip below 100
lol actually...bring it on!
AmberCutie said:As much as some people probably dislike your idea, I actually agree. Girls under 100 camscore can't be making more than about $2.00 per hour. If you're making that much, you're probably either not cut out to be a camgirl or should try out a different site.nzhere said:Limiting the models isn't a viable answer. It hurts models who are trying to scrape by, and prevents any new models from joining. And, despite the hope that it would spread the wealth around, it most likely won't. The top models will still be taking 90%+ of all the tokens available while they are online, and the bottom models will still be making hardly anything. Those in between probably won't see any significant increase in income, either.
I say after every cutoff day cull all the sub 100 camscores models and block them from resigning up for a minimum of 3 months.
If they have a camscore that low, they should perhaps find another site or cut their losses and quit.
nzhere said:Limiting the models isn't a viable answer. It hurts models who are trying to scrape by, and prevents any new models from joining. And, despite the hope that it would spread the wealth around, it most likely won't. The top models will still be taking 90%+ of all the tokens available while they are online, and the bottom models will still be making hardly anything. Those in between probably won't see any significant increase in income, either.
I say after every cutoff day cull all the sub 100 camscores models and block them from resigning up for a minimum of 3 months.
If they have a camscore that low, they should perhaps find another site or cut their losses and quit.
AmberCutie said:As much as some people probably dislike your idea, I actually agree. Girls under 100 camscore can't be making more than about $2.00 per hour. If you're making that much, you're probably either not cut out to be a camgirl or should try out a different site.nzhere said:Limiting the models isn't a viable answer. It hurts models who are trying to scrape by, and prevents any new models from joining. And, despite the hope that it would spread the wealth around, it most likely won't. The top models will still be taking 90%+ of all the tokens available while they are online, and the bottom models will still be making hardly anything. Those in between probably won't see any significant increase in income, either.
I say after every cutoff day cull all the sub 100 camscores models and block them from resigning up for a minimum of 3 months.
If they have a camscore that low, they should perhaps find another site or cut their losses and quit.
UncleThursday said:What happens if a particular model just has a bad month and drops to being in the cut zone, but normally earns better?
lexmark402003 said:How many of us .... started out thinking "I'm just going to spend the $20 to get premium so I can see the previews) and never spend any more?
nzhere said:UncleThursday said:What happens if a particular model just has a bad month and drops to being in the cut zone, but normally earns better?
If they have camscore under 100 well they are not having a bad month they are having a freaking bad YEAR. Running multiple sites is NOT an excuse.
lexmark402003 said:How many of us that have spent 100's or 1000's of dollars on MFC started out thinking "I'm just going to spend the $20 to get premium so I can see the previews) and never spend any more?
It's all about the numbers. For every 100 "guests", a certain number will become "basics". For every 100 basics, a certain number will become premiums. For every 100 premiums, a certain number will become regular spenders.
To get that guy who spend's 100s or 1000s of dollars, you have to put up with a bunch of freeloaders or $20 premiums.
I know I pledged to myself that I would not spend more than $20 on MFC.
That was probably $1,000 or so in the past.
Matt255 said:How does a girl with a low cam score affect MFC as a whole site? MFC is not dying just times are changing. What made some models a lot of tokens last year just does not cut it this year. There will always be freeloaders but there are ways around them.
Matt255 said:Does MFC start new cam girls with a standard cam score? New members and girls join each day its been that way since MFC started. Getting rid of the low cam scores girls besides increasing bandwidth how will it help struggling models?
LadyLuna said:Matt255 said:How does a girl with a low cam score affect MFC as a whole site? MFC is not dying just times are changing. What made some models a lot of tokens last year just does not cut it this year. There will always be freeloaders but there are ways around them.
The girl with the low camscore is taking up bandwidth, and not earning the site much money in return.
Otherwise, she doesn't really seem to have an effect.
UncleThursday said:LadyLuna said:Matt255 said:How does a girl with a low cam score affect MFC as a whole site? MFC is not dying just times are changing. What made some models a lot of tokens last year just does not cut it this year. There will always be freeloaders but there are ways around them.
The girl with the low camscore is taking up bandwidth, and not earning the site much money in return.
Otherwise, she doesn't really seem to have an effect.
Bandwidth is cheap, though. And the top earners probably bring in enough to MFC that their bandwidth is more than covered each month.
LadyLuna said:The girl with the low camscore is taking up bandwidth, and not earning the site much money in return.
Otherwise, she doesn't really seem to have an effect.
nzhere said:LadyLuna said:The girl with the low camscore is taking up bandwidth, and not earning the site much money in return.
Otherwise, she doesn't really seem to have an effect.
The members have no interest in "The girl with the low camscore" cutting the sub 100 girls should raise the quality of the models and push a few to work a bit harder.
Shaun__ said:My understanding of the cam score system is that if you cut the sub 100 women everybody's score would adjust down and you would have a new batch of sub 100 women. Is my understanding wrong?
Halfway through that sentence I thought you were talking about proposing to a 100 camscore girl :-D "bb, if you let me take you true pvt for the rest of my life u will make me the happiest member in teh world"bob said:i'm thinkin the best solution to eliminating this bfd is to find a woman who you (not you personally....the generic you) love body and soul, turn off the computer, and leave it to leo to figure it out
Shaun__ said:nzhere said:LadyLuna said:The girl with the low camscore is taking up bandwidth, and not earning the site much money in return.
Otherwise, she doesn't really seem to have an effect.
The members have no interest in "The girl with the low camscore" cutting the sub 100 girls should raise the quality of the models and push a few to work a bit harder.
For someone not interested in them you sure talk about them a lot. My understanding of the cam score system is that if you cut the sub 100 women everybody's score would adjust down and you would have a new batch of sub 100 women. Is my understanding wrong?