I was just banned and deleted from Snapchat, I'm posting so you others know it IS happening.

[NataliaGrey]

Snapcash went through Square cash, which I think you can still sign up separately for even if you don't have a snapchat now. Just like snapcash it only works in the US, but it's still pretty nifty!

https://cash.me/

 

[Teagan]

Square and Google Wallet have issues just like paypal does with adult things. Neither are safe to use and both will close your account if they find out about it.

 

[eyeteach]

What pisses me off about this whole situation is how some faceless, gutless, dickless turd or turd corporation that made truckloads of cash from people using their product suddenly get all moral and shit and decide that censorship is their best friend. You know what Snapchat? I hope you get fucked hard in the ass by the world's biggest dick while suffering a prolapsed anal sphincter developing the worst case of fire hemorrhoids mankind has ever recorded.

In short, eat shit and die.

Your pal,
eyeteach

 

[Guy]

Square and Google Wallet have issues just like paypal does with adult things. Neither are safe to use and both will close your account if they find out about it.

Which exchanges dont have issues with adult content?

 

[Teagan]

Which exchanges dont have issues with adult content?

Camsites. They may take a cut and that sucks but they provide a platform to meet those members to begin with therefore deserve it IMHO and you dont have to worry about being banned and the hassles with it.

 

[AerynShade]

Revolut allows adult services, as long as they're legal.

 

[Guy]

Im upset that Snapchat bans porn. I was about to get Snapchat for my smartphone so i could get nudes from a few models on MFC. I was so excited. I am actually crying right now.

 

[Picnic]

Does snapchat consider nude pictures to be pornography? Or are they literally referring to sex/sexual acts? As far as I know, the TOS does not state "no nudity allowed"...so what's the deal, there?

 

[Puffin]

Snapchat Terms of service
You will not post content that contains pornography

Pornography (merriam-webster dictionary)
1 : the depiction of erotic behavior (as in pictures or writing) intended to cause sexual excitement
2 : material (as books or a photograph) that depicts erotic behavior and is intended to cause sexual excitement
3 : the depiction of acts in a sensational manner so as to arouse a quick intense emotional reaction

 

[Guy]

Snapchat Terms of service
You will not post content that contains pornography

Pornography (merriam-webster dictionary)
1 : the depiction of erotic behavior (as in pictures or writing) intended to cause sexual excitement
2 : material (as books or a photograph) that depicts erotic behavior and is intended to cause sexual excitement
3 : the depiction of acts in a sensational manner so as to arouse a quick intense emotional reaction

Why is it that when I hear people say the words porn or pornography they are always referring to hardcore pornography? (content showing unsimulated sex)

 

[Teagan]

Why is it that when I hear people say the words porn or pornography they are always referring to hardcore pornography? (content showing unsimulated sex)

Because in our society just nakedness/nudity can be art and people dont put rules on art. It can make a person feel a myriad of ways. Pornography however is meant to just excite and arouse in most cases and people are crazy when it comes to those thoughts and feelings. Religion and prudes man.

 

[mutantdonut]

This is an FYI and relevant to the topic. Ms. Ferguson may have been targeted since it seems she went viral and brought all sorts of attention prior to her booting. Also note, the famed "library girl" who was a former mfc model was also kicked off snapchat for posting nudes.
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/254183/chelsea-ferguson-snapchat-twitter-nsfw/

Snapchat boots its stripper queen for posting n00dz [NSFW]
In News by Jamie Peck / June 30, 2015

An English stripper named Chelsea Ferguson has taken to Twitter in protest after Snapchat repeatedly kicked her off for distributing what it considered to be “pornographic content.”

According to The Daily Star, Ferguson, who works at the Blue Velvet gentlemen’s club in the very British sounding city of Newcastle Upon Tyne, has been kicked off the photo-sharing app multiple times for posting R-rated pictures of herself in an effort to promote her shifts at the club. Here’s one such photo:

For those not in the know, Snapchat lets people send each other photos that disappear after a set amount of time, making it the ideal venue for flashing one’s naked body either as a sexual come-on or, in the case of strippers, an advertisement for one’s work.

“I was the queen of Snapchat and my tits were the crown jewels so I think they should un-ban me and put me back on my throne,” the buxom entrepreneur told The Daily Star. “I have thousands of people tweet and message me every day saying they miss me on there and how it used to brighten up their day at work.”

Is Snapchat trying to overthrow the wage system? Thou hast slain the people’s monarch.

To add insult to injury, the Snapchat rep who banned her put a smug little smiley in the email explaining why she was banned:

The hypocrisy of banning nudity from an app invented so tweens could sext each other pictures of their genitals was not lost on the Queen:

“How can they ban me from Snapchat when people use it for sending pictures of your tits and arse – that’s what it was invented for. Millions of people downloaded Snapshat to see me in the first place so it’s them who are losing out.”

Maybe they were just jealous someone figured out how to monetize Snapchat before they did.

Ferguson has since retreated to the considerably more NSFW-friendly Twitter, where she has 730,000 followers as of this writing. She has re-posted many of her greatest tits there:

Tonight @BlueVelvetFYEO #TitsNMuscleFood@MuscleFoodUK pic.twitter.com/Biv8eqWq9K

— Chelsea Ferguson (@chelsfergo) June 20, 2015



Who remembers this? pic.twitter.com/CxKkL7FWSS

— Chelsea Ferguson (@chelsfergo) June 13, 2015



@BlueVelvetFYEO 8pm-4am tonight #FullyNudepic.twitter.com/Vb5cIWDYsh

— Chelsea Ferguson (@chelsfergo) June 12, 2015



If you miss my snapchat – check it out here #sedgyfergo@BlueVelvetFYEO #FullyNude tonight #Newcastlepic.twitter.com/HH8ZDHds1L

— Chelsea Ferguson (@chelsfergo) June 12, 2015



Fully nude video #SedgyFergo #snapchat@BlueVelvetFYEO pic.twitter.com/G9xEDQh07g

— Chelsea Ferguson (@chelsfergo) June 12, 2015



@bluvelvetFYEO #sedgyfergo #snapchatpic.twitter.com/HW1qHQkhUR

— Chelsea Ferguson (@chelsfergo) June 12, 2015



Tonight @BlueVelvetFYEO #sedgyfergo #snapchatpic.twitter.com/aj1eEgfDCE

— Chelsea Ferguson (@chelsfergo) June 5, 2015



In addition to her slammin’ stripper bod, many of her photos reveal an interest in food preparation; perhaps she’ll team up with Jamie “the Naked Chef” Oliver to teach the people of the UK about the benefits of a well-balanced diet.

 

[LoonaVision]

What if I send stories and snaps only to people I added to my friends list? This way my snapchat is not that public, right?
If snapchat is so strict about adult material then we need to find something else what allows us to show our bodies in all our glory

 

[kelliver]

I'm glad it's already been mentioned that the TOS have had rules against this for a while, I was about to say something myself. That said, I've got a couple things that might be helpful.

1. Sex work friendly payment options. I personally use Paxum, I quite like it and they're absolutely fine with any transactions involving the adult industry.
2. Didn't see it mentioned here, so I thought I'd add that you can also sell access to Snapchat, Kik, etc. through sites like ManyVids, which is obviously a safe transaction. Unlike the first option though they take a cut of it, of course, but there's that.
   
3. I don't use my regular work email for my Snapchat, I have a secondary email that's different from my usual one and I don't advertise it anywhere. I use it for Kik and Snapchat just so that the account itself isn't so easily linked to my work profiles.
4. If you can, don't post your Snapchat name anywhere it's easily accessible, keep it hidden and only give it to subscribers - if it's written down on any of your webpages it can be indexed by Google and if anyone really wanted to find it, it would make it easier for them.

The way Snapchat's terms of service reads, there's a loophole that I think people have been getting by with since sex workers began selling subscriptions to their Snapchat feed - they can't legally use any information you give them (such as your email that you used to sign up) to try and track you down and find out whether or not you are selling access to your feed, so as long as you cover your tracks you can manage.

Of course, if someone's intent on being a dick and reporting you, there's only so much you can do. But I figured this might help for anyone who doesn't know some of these things.

 

[Sevrin]

ya'll

Let me just interject here that the proper spelling is "y'all".

 

[RebeccaT]

I don't know why more girls don't just use a private/"protected" Twitter account for this sort of thing. I thought about making a 2nd one to use specifically to send out sexy pics to big tippers without sharing them publicly. Then only add people to the allowed followers list that I wanted to see the goodies.

I'm not sure this wouldn't still be against Twitter rules. It'd be great to do although anyone with access would see who else has access.

 

[Guy]

The way Snapchat's terms of service reads, there's a loophole that I think people have been getting by with since sex workers began selling subscriptions to their Snapchat feed - they can't legally use any information you give them (such as your email that you used to sign up) to try and track you down and find out whether or not you are selling access to your feed, so as long as you cover your tracks you can manage.

I know that Facebook monitors their users private messages and chats for violations of their terms of service. If Facebook has the legal right to monitor their users usage of their services, I would assume that Snapchat also has the legal right to monitor their users usage of their services. They are both privately owned companies.

 

[kelliver]

I know that Facebook monitors their users private messages and chats for violations of their terms of service. If Facebook has the legal right to monitor their users usage of their services, I would assume that Snapchat also has the legal right to monitor their users usage of their services. They are both privately owned companies.

Private messages are one thing, but I personally never use Snapchat for messaging, and I only advertise that I post snaps to my story because without writing anything down they can't index my messages looking for specific words and phrases.

I think you may have misunderstood me; Snapchat can obviously monitor how you use the app to make sure that you aren't violating their TOS, but I mean that they can't really go snooping around too far on the internet trying to incriminate you before they start stepping over the terms of their own privacy policy.

 

[Teagan]

Private messages are one thing, but I personally never use Snapchat for messaging, and I only advertise that I post snaps to my story because without writing anything down they can't index my messages looking for specific words and phrases.

I think you may have misunderstood me; Snapchat can obviously monitor how you use the app to make sure that you aren't violating their TOS, but I mean that they can't really go snooping around too far on the internet trying to incriminate you before they start stepping over the terms of their own privacy policy.

Their privacy policy is like any other where they agree to keep your stuff private except when they dont want to or cant (subpoenas, etc.) That doesnt mean they cant go looking around to see who is using their stuff wherever they want to. Any company can do that all they want. They can snoop anywhere at any time to incriminate you. Why you think they cant IDK but nothing is stopping them.

 

[kelliver]

Might be a difference in Canadian laws to U.S. laws, idk.

 

[Teagan]

Might be a difference in Canadian laws to U.S. laws, idk.

Even in Canada. SC is US based anyway and by using it you agree to their rules so it matters not where you are. Besides that nothing stops any company from looking you up online or it's users either and checking you out. It's the internet after all. Being in Canada doesnt stop them at all and again i'm not sure why you think a company can not.

 

[kelliver]

Even in Canada. SC is US based anyway and by using it you agree to their rules so it matters not where you are. Besides that nothing stops any company from looking you up online or it's users either and checking you out. It's the internet after all. Being in Canada doesnt stop them at all and again i'm not sure why you think a company can not.

Alright, my mistake. In any case my original points still stand, minus that part.

 

[AnneDVille]

I find it really odd that in 2015 the no. 1 public enemy everywhere is porn.
Great.

 

[QuietLurker69]

I wonder if something like casper would work.
I've been using the app for like 6 months now, and apparently it works even if the account is banned.

Here is a technical post by the creator
https://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/35h4ir/casper_app_only_sends_your_google_credentials_to/

I used a new email when signing up for it
=================================================================
It is a third party app

 

[Guy]

What if I send stories and snaps only to people I added to my friends list? This way my snapchat is not that public, right?
If snapchat is so strict about adult material then we need to find something else what allows us to show our bodies in all our glory

Wickr https://www.wickr.com/ They dont ban porn and you can set the expiration time for content.

 

[Alisa]

I wonder if something like casper would work.
I've been using the app for like 6 months now, and apparently it works even if the account is banned.

Here is a technical post by the creator
https://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/35h4ir/casper_app_only_sends_your_google_credentials_to/

I used a new email when signing up for it
=================================================================
It is a third party app

Casper got me blocked three times with snapchat and on the third time my account got deleted. It's an awesome app though, but Snapchat is fighting it with every update.

 

[Guy]

Casper got me blocked three times with snapchat and on the third time my account got deleted. It's an awesome app though, but Snapchat is fighting it with every update.

Have you ever tried wickr?

 

[weirdbr]

CyberDust is an awesome app I used instead of snapchat for a while. They actually delete photos and nothing stays anywhere.

In fact, Cyberdust is too eager to delete. On Snapchat, if someone sends you private snaps, you can swipe right and see the type (pictures/videos/chat) without opening them, which is great for me since I get both picture/video as well as text messages and can reply to the texts at work without having to sneak somewhere to check the video/pictures. On Cyberdust, the moment you click on a contact, it flags all messages as viewed and will immediately delete it as soon as you switch out of the contact view or from the app - there were multiple times I was checking messages, someone called my phone, taking the focus away from the app and, when I went back, all messages I hadn't read/viewed were gone.

I know that Facebook monitors their users private messages and chats for violations of their terms of service.

Do you *know* or assume to know? Legally speaking, you grant Facebook that right when you accept the terms of service, but the reality is that this right is not invoked unless it is involving a subpoena requesting that, otherwise they (and any company doing the same) would be in trouble. At work (one company that has similar terms of use), the only allowed access to private data requires legal approval and it is to produce data for Legal to review and, if necessary, to hand over to law enforcement/courts after a subpoena.

I was wondering if you or anything else has any warnings about GoogleWallet transfers.

A while back I posted here about it - someone at work got their google wallet account locked because the message contained the word 'donation'; they managed to get it unlocked but took hours on the phone clearing that up and that involved the person nagging friends who work for Google to internally escalate that issue.
Also, I'd suggest staying away from it simply because usage patterns for camgirls are possibly quite different from other users (camgirls possibly have a higher rate of incoming transfers from multiple people, while normal users have a more balanced/stable set of transactions/senders), which means your account is likely to be flagged really fast for additional screening.

 

[Guy]

Do you *know* or assume to know? Legally speaking, you grant Facebook that right when you accept the terms of service, but the reality is that this right is not invoked unless it is involving a subpoena requesting that, otherwise they (and any company doing the same) would be in trouble. At work (one company that has similar terms of use), the only allowed access to private data requires legal approval and it is to produce data for Legal to review and, if necessary, to hand over to law enforcement/courts after a subpoena.

http://mashable.com/2012/07/12/facebook-scanning-chats/#ZrU8dkwm9iqM

 

[Alisa]

Have you ever tried wickr?

Yes.

In fact, Cyberdust is too eager to delete. On Snapchat, if someone sends you private snaps, you can swipe right and see the type (pictures/videos/chat) without opening them, which is great for me since I get both picture/video as well as text messages and can reply to the texts at work without having to sneak somewhere to check the video/pictures. On Cyberdust, the moment you click on a contact, it flags all messages as viewed and will immediately delete it as soon as you switch out of the contact view or from the app - there were multiple times I was checking messages, someone called my phone, taking the focus away from the app and, when I went back, all messages I hadn't read/viewed were gone.

That is true and is somewhat annoying.