I teach English writing to adults. English syntax, especially in a written form, can be difficult, even for people who grew up speaking it. A person's vocabulary is actually not a good marker for whether or not a person understands how to write English. Words and definitions tend to be learned by rote. The nuance of contextual meaning, however, is far more organic. I think it's a good thing that most of the people on here are actually smart and thoughtful, and good writers, but I also think that it's taken for granted that this is what the population of ACF consists of. The fact of the matter is that it's through active policing by members that the good communicators stay, and those who are hard to understand are drummed out. I've seen it happen several times, now, where people are ripped apart not so much for what they are stating, but rather for how they have stated it. For fuck's sake, we're quibbling over the use of a single word as a defining marker for a man's total character, here. As an English teacher, I find that utterly ridiculous.
Anyway, that's if for me in this debate. I've done my part to derail this thread well enough.
Anyway, that's if for me in this debate. I've done my part to derail this thread well enough.