Re: Daniele Watts cuffed and detained for being in public ma
camstory said:
...There's Multiple blah blah blahs here...(shortened for brevity)
camstory makes a lot of good points here. A lot. And adds some BS, as well. No biggie, that's just part of his narrative
This will not be well received here. No matter, the truth is usually not well received.
If you are approached by the police and refuse to show an ID, you are a dumb ass. End of story. This doesn't mean you deserve a beating or maltreatment because of that. But if you think any police will just let you go on your merry way without ascertaining your identity, you are a dumb ass once again.
If you think that asking for your ID, that you are being abused, the correct time to state your case is not at the scene. If you have done nothing wrong, why is it a good idea to escalate things then and there? File a complaint later.
In this instance, if the lady had shown her ID when requested, I am almost 100% certain that she would have been on her way in a minute or two. Her boyfriend/husband/RAWKer cooperated and wasn't handcuffed. She is trying to make it a black/white thing, but it appears to me that it was a cooperating/UN-cooperating thing. The RAWKer cooperated right away and he wasn't handcuffed or detained.
There's been a whole lot of talk here about "rights", "my rights", her rights", all that crap. I'm positive that the commenters have spent years studying the law at presigious law schools. /s Whole lot of silly comments like:
In the US, you have a constitutional right to confront our accuser--so if the accuser didn't want to be there, it's all s/eh said she said.
Come on Nordling, this is silly, even for you. Yes, we DO have those rights. IN COURT. Not at the scene. Feel free to fan the flames, but in this case, you just look silly.
'innocent until proven guilty' into 'guilty until proven innocent'
Again, this applies when the case gets to a court/jury. Not at the scene.
Of course, I expect that some here will think that I am a gun toting, NRA card carrying, Neanderthal red-state-r who thinks that the police can do no wrong. That's OK. Not true, but OK if you feel that way. The truth of the matter is that I'm appalled at any story of real police brutality, BUT I am not ready to paint all police with the same brush, and refuse to believe that 100% of the police are bad and out to get us. I feel sorry for those folks that believe that. If you do feel that way, what are you doing about it? Are you voting? Are you petitioning your City Council, or demanding a Citizens Review Board? It is safe to say that our collective police forces have some bad apples. Just as any segment of our population. Bad camgirls? Bad MFC members? You bet. Pretty easy to deal with those examples. Not so easy to deal with the bad apples in the police forces. Go ahead and complain, it's your "right". But unless you're willing to do something about it, you're part of the problem.
I believe that there are a lot of facts in this case that we don't know about yet. There have been reports that this was not a "random" stop, that the police were called. Maybe they were, maybe they weren't. I find it funny (not really funny) that solely on this lady's facebook post that there was a rush to judgement that the police profiled her, abused her, etc. People, please. I have a hunch that even if there is irrefutable proof (doubtful that exists) that the police were not "wrong", there will still be folks complaining on this incident. Hey that's their "right" to do that. But I'm going to save my outrage for real problems.
I admit to being cynical, so when the 2nd & 3rd round of news started filtering down, my thought was that this lady engineered and escalated the incident for publicity and sympathy. If I'm proved wrong, I'll come back here and apologize to her