- Dec 1, 2017
- 102
- 72
- 33
- 34
- Twitter Username
- @CBRyuki22
- Chaturbate Username
- Ryuki22
- ManyVids URL
- https://www.manyvids.com/Profile/1000906680/Ryuki22/
fuck it, yolo. if you can afford some volatility giver.
which is why i said if you can afford volatility go for it, you can not; i respect that.
@venomous kind of why I'm still researching and learning more about many of the altcoins. I think the Bitcoin bubble is too high, but catching one of the others on the early floor levels is interesting.
There are also a lot of questions over Bitcoin's intrinsic value/lack thereof, leading many to refer to the cryotocurrency as a " speculative bubble." There are also concerns over its legality, the effects of recent FCC rulings, and its usage to purchase drugs and child pornography.
Regardless, Bitcoin most definitely has at least a few more drops and surges ahead of it-- given its volatility, I don't think Bitcoin would make a cogent long-term investment.
However, if you do the proper research and analysis, watch the values, you could potentially make some money in day/swing trading-- either way, I recommend seeking professional advice.
I don't disagree with what you said. But I had laugh at seeking professional advice. Where the hell do you find professional advice on bitcoin? Any traditional financial advisor will tel you to stay away from Bitcoin except for your gambling account, and the rare honest ones will tell you that couldn't tell you the difference between SHA256 hash function, a block chain, and smart contract if their lives depended on it.
So for professional advise you are left with this guy. (It is a parody)
I lost it at "scarcity is what makes nothing valuable" xD
I wasn't saying that the OP should necessarily seek out professional advice to invest in Bitcoin, but BEFORE he did it himself. That way he could get a more comprehensive look at why Bitcoin may or may not be the right choice than we can give, as well as shares his goals in investing and discuss possible alternatives.
We are doing since 2016.
And is the #1 reason why I have issues with cryptocurrency, as well as when people say going to purely electronic voting is the way to go.
N.O.P.E.!!!!
Unless you keep your money as cash, your money is nothing but a balance in a computer somewhere. Not sure how that's much different. Bank accounts get hacked all the time. The problem is really with the sites that store your crypto wallet (which you don't need to use if you don't want to), not crypto currency itself. If your bank has poor security, that's a flaw with your bank, not with the currency itself. Granted, money in a bank account is insured, but there's really no reason bitcoin wallets can't be insured as well. Again, nothing to do with the currency itself, but rather the systems built to support it.
The problem with current financial transactions is that you have to give your credit card # or checking account# out to everyone you spend it with. Those same numbers also allow other people to spend your money. With crypto currency, that's not the case. Only the person who posesses the private key is able to spend it. Transactions are signed with the private key and verified through your public key. The private key is a number that is never given out. This actually makes crypto currency much easier to secure than traditional currency.
Need to clear a few things up here:
Financial backing: Bank accounts are insured, currently there is none for cryptocurrency. It's also very difficult to insure something which has 20-30% variances in a short period of time. What's the real value? Yes, USD, etc have swings also. But, it's pretty much universally available and more stable than Cryptocurrency. Crypto is a very special market, and if I want to get out I need to find a buyer with real world currency. So, it still falls back to the current currencies of the world.
I'm very familiar with private/public keys, so I understand the workings of them. However, what happens if your private key becomes corrupt, lost, or stolen? Believe it or not, key signing is not without its own inherant problems and security risks. Yes, in a CC, you give them the number and they can attempt to make purchases. But, if the date and three digit code are incorrect, they can't do it electronically. So, it's a type of added security measure. With crypto, how do you handle purchases in a store which doesn't accept phone readers? Credit card loaded with cryptocurrency? No different than how credit cards are handled now is it?
As to bank account numbers, the only time those are given out are to financial institutions for when I'm doing transfers between banks/accounts of my own. Or, direct deposit from my employer. If I pay someone, it's in cash or paypal, google wallet, etc.
There's still a lot of issues to work out with crypto currencies. But, there's some improvements and I can see it improving our current currencies. But, in the long run, it most likely won't be viable as it will become regulated like all other currencies are due to taxes, etc.
I'm not disagreeing those are problems. Maybe I'm arguing semantics here, but I don't think it's accurate to point out the problems of a currency vs an entire financial system. Bitcoin is a currency, not an entire financial system (although it does replace some aspects of it). If comparing the flaws of something, it should be compared to it's equivalent. It's kind of like saying, "This engine sucks because it's not as fast as a corvette". Well yeah, it still needs wheels, a chassis, transmission, and well, the rest of the car. However, if you replace the engine in the corvette with this one, it'll be way faster. Same thing here. If you replace the USD with Bitcoin in our current financial system, it may (or may not) be much better. That's the way I evaluate bitcoin rather than trying to compare it to something it's not. Bitcoin is a currency, so it should be compared to the USD (or your currency of choice). The problems you've brought up (which are completely legitimate), are also problems with every other currency out there. They were mitigated by building many financial systems around them, rather than being solved by the currency itself. Pointing out the problems of a currency vs a complete financial system seems to me like an apples to oranges comparison. Our same financial systems in use for the USD could be adapted to handle bitcoin as well and offering all of the same protections. Doing so would solve most of what you brought up. If banks and credit card processors started accepting bitcoin, those problems would be solved.
Of course, this discussion is probably moot since I don't think that'll ever happen. I'm very skeptical of cryptocurrency ever being accepted and widely used. Nothing to do with technical reasons or anything related to the currency itself though.
Historical world currencies, typically have a backing to it such as gold, silver, etc. The US, and many other countries used to do that, and are now a fiat currency which is backed by the Gov't. It get really complex quickly. But, in comparison to cryptocurrency, it is much more stable and has something of value behind it. I'm not sure if bitcoin or others have any kind of real financial backing. Especially given its volatility, and its difficulty when it comes to ease of use/access. Again, to me, it is much more of a commodity that's bought/sold and not used to purchase something on a daily basis.
But, because it is slowly being used to purchase goods, it is also transforming into a currency with a complete financial system that mimics the US and world's markets. I don't think it will replace it, especially since there isn't a type of oversight, protection backed by an entity, etc. Also, the Euro is having issues, due to the disparity between the countries involved. So, will be interesting to see what comes of it all.
I'm not against innovation, as I think lessons learned could be applied to improve. I just really have difficulties seeing the viability of this long term.