I'm really not sure if this is a question or a statement or what, but it doesn't make much sense. Soooooo....
Ok let met reformulate it - How do you think the "risky adult transactions" are impeding sites revenue?
You do realize that if there's more successful big name camming sites out there you'll more than likely be making less money unless you also spread yourself across all of those sites? But still, the reason why there's a handful that do so well is because of the nature of the business. Like I said before, fraud is prevalent in this industry. It goes both ways. And so, members are going to be cautious with which sites they can trust to use their payment info on, which makes it hard for there to be tons of wildly successful sites. And about having the same practices, are you talking about them taking their cut? Because that's going to be the case no matter the site. They're a business, not a charity.
i already answered to this in my first post in this topic. Cheaper tokens for users while keeping them at the same value for the model = more traffic due to more paying users.
It is true that most streaming services tend to become monopolitic. THe solution is the diversification of the format not more CB clones. Youtube basically ate all his smaller concurrents, but it doesn't cause a problem to Twitch, Netflix or Rabbit. Free chat webcam sites and private oriented sites aren't truly in competition as they address to a different public.