AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

Allcamsfree - new site coming soon

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
Status
Not open for further replies.
If I am understanding this right....
What you are setting up is a system where the models can arbitrarily change the rates, use the ignore feature to "block" all but the high rollers and those who tip regularly, and see/collect stats on their regulars.

I dunno. I think it will turn off the members that make up the bulk of the tipping in 5-20 token tips from members who can only buy 200 or so every few months.

I would imagine that is the bulk of the tipping action. If you give the models the ability to weed those out and keep only the high rollers, the system is gonna self destruct. You'll have a site with 50 members with deep pockets.

Why dont you just cut to the chase and charge a monthly min token purchase of $100, you'll get the same effect.

I dunno, maybe it'll work. As a customer I would be very put off that the models can jigger the prices at their whim. Doesn't seem fair.

However if I was the one naked on cam, I probably would have a different viewpoint... maybe.
:lol:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jessi J
Paulie Walnuts said:
If I am understanding this right....
What you are setting up is a system where the models can arbitrarily change the rates, use the ignore feature to "block" all but the high rollers and those who tip regularly, and see/collect stats on their regulars.

I dunno. I think it will turn off the members that make up the bulk of the tipping in 5-20 token tips from members who can only buy 200 or so every few months.

I would imagine that is the bulk of the tipping action. If you give the models the ability to weed those out and keep only the high rollers, the system is gonna self destruct. You'll have a site with 50 members with deep pockets.

Why dont you just cut to the chase and charge a monthly min token purchase of $100, you'll get the same effect.

I dunno, maybe it'll work. As a customer I would be very put off that the models can jigger the prices at their whim. Doesn't seem fair.

However if I was the one naked on cam, I probably would have a different viewpoint... maybe.
:lol:

As someone who worked on a site where I set my own prices, I hated it. There was so much pressure on me to set the rate as low as possible- and the kind of customers I was getting were not exactly the most pleasant to deal with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jessi J
allcamsfree said:
I think the information we give to the model actually should improve the experience of the member; If the model is aware that of 1000 paying customers in her room that 45% have tokens, 30% never go private and 76% tip for public shows then the model has a better chance of earning and the member has more chance of the model delivering a show that appeals to them.
I think I may have looked at this a bit differently from everyone else. I think this part could be a really great feature for members and models! It could help us choose what kind of shows to do (I.E privates, groups or countdowns) based on these very general numbers and make the time more enjoyable for all.
Let me give an example.
If I know 75% of the members in my room prefer tipping towards public stuff then I know it will be a good time to do a countdown because...
A. It won't likely take me as long to reach the goal and I don't have to feel pressured or frustrated, that is if those numbers actually translate.
B. If more people are taking part in the countdown then the members who always tip are not going to be the only ones pulling the weight and that can make it more enjoyable for them. More team work, less pressure. Same goes with group shows. If 85% of the members prefer group shows then it likely wont take a guy 4 tries to get two other people on board to start.

This feature alone gives no direct, personal info of the members, just a general idea to help guide the model into the best show choice to hopefully make it easier and less stressful for all involved, member and model.
That's just how I saw it.
I could also see it giving us false hopes that turns into getting frustrated quickly if it's not going the way the numbers would suggest it should. I guess that's not too different than having 400+ members on a slow day and wondering "why can't I get my boobies out" but it is a bit more info that could encourage crushed spirits too easily. But that's all in how the model chooses to handle herself.

I like this feature, and I would think any member who has been frustrated trying to get a group together or get a countdown moving would like it too. *shrug*

Good luck on your site. MFC is my home but I'll be excited to see what the site is like once I can actually see it. :-D
 
The name makes me think of those MFC ads - "if you pay for live sex you're a sucker!" :lol:
 
Just taking a different approach to all of the other comments. I personally never feel comfortable giving my information to a site which I know nothing about or can't even see how it works. I understand the things that you are offering but until I see a site that is up and running I always trust the credability of a company and giving them any of my personal information (which is needed in your sign up process) I think if you want more models who are willing to potentially sign up with your company that until the site is launched you shouldn't require so much personal information. I for one am not willing to put all my personal information on a site that I don't even know truly exists yet.

I suppose I may be paranoid. If I am however interested in seeing where the site goes, I have to wait and see once it's launched because plugging in my personal information on a site that I know nothing about simply just won't happen.
You may considering collecting SOME information from future models. Like there names, DOB, and email. Then when the site is launched ask for the information needed for them to actually be a registered model on the site.

Just my personal opinion. Hey like they say opinions are like assholes and everyone has one. I am just giving my :twocents-02cents:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jessi J
Too soon to determine a site that has yet to open. The impression I have seen from the glitz ads is it may be to "busy" for my tastes. I like simple interfaces where all you have to do is log in and you click to view. I would hate go to a site where you are clicking too many options only to find out you cannot view something because of a restriction set on another end. I am even unsure if site is web-based or you have to download anything. If you are wanting a user to download any type of software....sorry count me out as a user. It does look like it is built for a models end, but make sure you read their contract so you are not locked into something that may limit your money making elsewhere. :twocents-02cents:


~worm~
 
I always have a odd feeling these sites are all run by MFC and they are just trying out new shit on test audiences.
Or has the internet just ran out of original domain names?
 
A few questions for ACF.

1 Will you be allowing Philippines based models and studios to signup? and if so which I.d's will you accept.

2 How do you plan to deal with the resources involved in monitoring and administering them? considering MFC had to deal with so many issues from models and studios in that part of the world. that they ended up dumping them.

3 Do you plan to have 24x7 online live chat support available to models and members?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LailaBaise
nzhere said:
A few questions for ACF.

1 Will you be allowing Philippines based models and studios to signup? and if so which I.d's will you accept.

2 How do you plan to deal with the resources involved in monitoring and administering them? considering MFC had to deal with so many issues from models and studios in that part of the world. that they ended up dumping them.

3 Do you plan to have 24x7 online live chat support available to models and members?
nz :(

This site you are on is what we refer to as ACF... until their cam site is up, running, and successful enough, I'd appreciate it if you'd respect this forum by not giving away our name already. ;)
 
Yeah my questions were aimed at "allcamsfree" aka acf

The site has been pimped quite a bit in mfc's "asian lounge" yeah yeah, the one the members made to replace the official one that MFC shutdown.:lol:

They believe all the Phillipines models mfc booted will suddenly have a new place to manipulate. I mean work at.
 
I do expect and appreciate any and all loyal forum members to use "ACF" to refer to this forum rather than any other cam related site at this time.

Please and thank you. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marokite
The allcamsfree.com mentioned in this thread is now up and running. Looks interesting some nice ideas on it but pretty buggy, they could of left it for a while longer.
 
Why is it that every time I see a post like this from a "new cam site" in a camming forum, the person posting seems to lack the ability to accurately describe the site? It always seems to go like this:

Site Rep.- "Hi ladies, we have this new site launching and here's how awesome it's going to be blah blah blah"

Models- "But blah blah blah won't work/seems odd. What about blah blah blah?"

Site Rep.- "Oh, I MEANT to say blah blah blah, so sorry, THIS is what I actually meant. Don't worry your pretty little heads. We got this, and you're going to make lots of money!"

Models- "Mhm, sure buddy."

Seriously, if someone made a presumably sizable investment to start a cam site, why would you not ensure that the reps you send out to recruit the women who will ultimately make you or break you can adequately present your site?
 
Also, I'd like to point out that while the stupid-easy way that freeloaders can well, freeload, on MFC can be quite frustrating ... MFC simply would not have as many paying customers of it weren't this way. This model where the women can pretty much ignore all but the actual spenders will discourage the type of massive traffic that MFC gets. More traffic = more potential paying customers. And while this can sometimes suck for MFC models, I am of the opinion that this very model made MFC what it is. I think if this site intends to be a tip-based site like MFC, they should rethink their business model. That's just me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.