I do think it's a very good idea for a project. Being open and throwing ball park amount out there is helpful. I know you don't feel comfy sharing your identity, and that's good. But I think it does help models if you share as much info as you can in the thread, about what you're looking for, what is entailed, what you can compensate etc etc I do think there will more likely be people interested if you do that.
Honestly, this is my first time trying to work with people outside of my friends and family. I generally struggle with this in person, but weirdly on the internet it becomes easier. This process of dissociation online is at the heart of the project. Some more information:
- I shoot on 35mm and 120mm film with a Nikon and Pentax 67
- I would love to have conversations on here about the project if anyone would like to but am also looking for people possibly interested in being more involved photographically
- I can happily pay in the range of 20-50 an hour
- I can also trade work as a photographer if that would be helpful to somebody, high quality and edited images
- I've been working in photography and sculpture for three years since my sophomore year at university in Connecticut.
This is the working version of my artist statement for the project:
My thesis is based in a marxist aesthetic theory. It works through the contemporary means of production to highlight and asehteticize contemporary life as it is mediated by technology, data, computer science, and how these shape a unique contemporary experience of memory. Memory is viewed as the basis for human consciousness. Memory as it works through vision and experience is particularly emphasized. This is shown by deconstructing images using computer science techniques intervened in by hand making objects, and materializing the data into a physical relationship with the image. The same techniques used to analyze categorize and commercialize our digital (now involuntary) existence. I hope by exploring a wide variety of interactions mediated by the internet, the apparatus of the digital world will become the subject of the work, abstracting the individuals the same way that the internet does through dissociation. Weirtz says photo is a philosophical enlightenment to painting. What enlightens photo? Is data neccecary to abstract photography? Or do aesthetics evolve to abstract the machine through its apparent failure to serve its function?
Do you think it is worth reposting this thread or that would probably just cause a worse reaction?