AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

Search results

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
  1. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    And precisely why they're failing, to be honest. Well, that and the fact that Johnson in particular is terrible at actually communicating any sort of libertarian principles (and honestly doesn't seem to have any.) Wasn't sure on the fiduciary, thanks for clarification there. I mean, the...
  2. Behemoth

    Blockchain enthusiasts? Interest in Cryptocurrencies?

    I think they've got promise and are maturing. Fascinating to study too.
  3. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    I mean, using tax loopholes would make one a good businessman. He lost money during an economic downturn. Not that shocking. Like, he IS a good businessman, in a relative scale. Like, how does Trump using a bad tax code make him suddenly ineligable to speak to it? (And Hillary used the same...
  4. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    I don't get the argument that Trump using the tax code as it is written constitues sone grave abuse? This seems like an odd argument, like... What did you expect? He ignores his feduciary responsibilities to companies? He pay more than legally required? Like, of all the things to roast Trump...
  5. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    Technically, it was a sort of bait and switch, because no, the question was "name a foreign leader you respect." To which he came up with one person, but forgot the name. It's being presented as 'Gary Johnson couldn't name a leader!' but that wasn't the question. That said, Gary Johnson is a...
  6. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    But they HAVE dug up things. For fuck sakes, the DNC email scandal alone IS STUFF. That she lied about the Private Email Server is also a known fact. And that just is the recent stuff. This idea that somehow nothing was found is just blatantly dishonest. Honestly, its almost brilliant. They just...
  7. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    No, the only one inferring preference is you. I don't want either. I won't support either. I won't vote, donate, or in any way support any candidate. In the same way I can state that a gunshot from a .308 rifle is worse than 9mm handgun, that does not mean I'm expressing a desire to shot or...
  8. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    I'm saying that given the scope and scale of what we know for Hillary, compared to what we know for Trump, Hillary is worse. Otherwise, your argument basically amounts to 'well, we can't know so why bother.'
  9. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    Yes, actually, we can, because even the incomplete picture of Hillary marks her worse than Trump. And I'm saying she's not more stable than Trump, in any way. She's as bad, at the best. But you're right, so many folks had a hand, what difference does it make? I want to point out that while...
  10. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    Further, how does that explain association prior to that apology?
  11. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    This argument only works if you posit that unless we know absolutely 100% of every detail, it's not necessary to keep the tally. But we can know for certain things have happened even if we don't know the full details. We DO know, for certain, the tally, even if we don't know the 100% of every...
  12. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    They referred to targeting the latino vote as 'mopping up Taco Bowl engagement.'
  13. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    One, yes we absolutely can know for sure, and at no point is 'forgetting the tally of evil' ever acceptable. Two, no, Hillary will not be 'stable,' in as much as the only constant she and those like her have brought is instability. Stability like she brought to Libya, for example? Hillary won't...
  14. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    Ah, well more understandable then. No, not that.
  15. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    ...I don't even understand how you'd get that interpretation from what the Dem emails said, but carry on. I mean, this is true, but I don't think it makes it any less of a racist comment.
  16. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    TIL referring to an ethnic group by a stereotypical food name is not racist.
  17. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    ...yes? Like, how is this a question? Of course I am, hence why I'm speaking about how bad she is. That doesn't mean Trump will be good, or that you should support him, but like, you present this as some sort of gotcha. Like, yes, I'm terrified of Hillary, merely scared of Trump. What of it...
  18. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    Your lack of a substantive point aside from personal attacks is once again notable. Like, seriously, your entire style is just personal attacks, posturing, and false superiority. Your not even worth getting mad over, because it's frankly just... rote and sad. The thing is, I don't have to...
  19. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    The problem is, you have to map when she, and by and large the entire Democrat party, was embracing the Byrd and the KKK long before any apology, then ask yourself if an apology late in life represents a legitimate shift in view, or a political maneuver. Given the revelations found in the leaked...
  20. Behemoth

    Anarchism, Libertarianism, etc...

    No party is legitimate, everyone is crooks. :P
Top Bottom
Back