AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

Search results

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
  1. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    What decisions require that level of agreement?
  2. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    These decisions need not injure pure liberty at all. I think the implication they must is inherently a wrong one. The only time liberty is injured is when the individual's desires are ignored, at which point we can't really say the 'social unit's goals are achieved' because they are done so at...
  3. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    By it's nature, yes, the more libertarian principles applied, the less oppressive it would be, to the ultimate fact that without a state, there is no state-based oppression. Don't get me wrong, I think America is largely LESS oppressive than other countries, but that doesn't mean the state...
  4. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    That doesn't mean you can rationally argue something is true. Logically and rationally arguing what is moral and ethical is the only way to establish what IS. To wit: you own yourself, because you exclusively have the ability to control yourself and thus are exclusively responsible for your...
  5. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    Theft is always wrong, period. Killing someone abusing you isn't 'murder,' in as much as they are aggression on you, they are assaulting you. Morals actually ARE far more black and white than folks try to say. They can be iffy but those examples are clear cut. The fundamental principle of...
  6. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    Rational inquiry. Morals HAVE to be universal, or they are merely preference, else are you trying to tell me that murder, theft, rape, and the like are not actually WRONG universally? Companies cater to who is paying them, why would they cater to 'the group?' The behavior of the government...
  7. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    If morality is subjective, it's not morality, it's merely opinion. I strongly, vehemently disagree with any implication that morality is subjective. On the contract, I think the only morality that can exist has to be objective.
  8. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    Privatized prisons don't really count, because they're really not private at all. They may be 'privately owned,' but they exist only as part of the State-run legal system, and all that entails. This is akin to saying privatization is bad because government contractors are bad. But government...
  9. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    Does this implicit agreement extend to any other things? By what basis does this implicit agreement stem? Indeed, what are the terms of this contract, and is there any escape clause? Why is someone bound to this by virtue of being born?
  10. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    Ok, but I did not elect them. I did not even consent to the election. They are not representing me, because I did not send them nor grant them consent to represent me. It doesn't 'feel like' coercion, it IS coercion. The sheer fact that you concede that changing things can't happen unless there...
  11. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    I suspect this is simply a mix of how I speak, intention or not, and the fact that I live by the principle of giving what is returned. When I entered this discussion, there was already a distinct opposition to ideals that I espouse before I even spoke, and the initial response to me only made it...
  12. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    I'm noting a pattern between folks who like to substitute emojis for arguments. I also only just now noticed these edits... First off, you still never bothered to argue the ethical nature of taxation, to which your quip about a yawn was about, but hey, lets actually get into your argument...
  13. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    Well, since you challenged me, yeah, I'll argue it. Though first, I'll point out the vacuous bullshit of accusing me of it mattering more about 'argument jousting' than 'anything else.' Excuse me if I am wrong, but I was under the assumption that in a discussion of serious topics, trying to...
  14. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    Well, glad you had an argument to back that up, and weren't just saying that without making an attempt to even justify why. In fact, that seems a running theme. Folks seem to substitute CALLING something ridiculous for actually making an argument why it is. How curious.
  15. Behemoth

    Do you think sex is overrated?

    I think we define 'bad' differently. Not in terms of you being wrong, mind you. I think my point may have escaped you. The point I'm making is that you're saying it is overrated because you have better things to do than that, to which my point is "well, than that would fall under 'not the right...
  16. Behemoth

    Do you think sex is overrated?

    Arguably speaking, this entire situation would simply be a confirmation of my point. Namely, you're describing exactly why the sex is bad, but that doesn't make sex, conceptually overrated, it means your partners and the specific acts are shit. :P
  17. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    Ok, but all taxation is theft. Calling it 'reductionist' doesn't make it wrong.
  18. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    Do you work at being insufferable and showing you can't actually make arguments or does it come naturally?
  19. Behemoth

    Who are you voting for?

    So, the fact that the government does not enforce its own laws does not mean it cannot. They absolutely can arrest you for failure to pay taxes, simply because folks get away with it doesn't change the fact the laws are on the books. The article you link even says as much, it simply notes that...
  20. Behemoth

    The Glamorization of Murder

    To the first point, the things you brought up were not largely relevant to that topic. You're introducing new variables that aren't necessary and distracting from the point. To the second, attempting to shift and reframe is a very weaselly move, and this is not at all relevant. No, I did not...
Top Bottom
Back